Are GM crops a solution to increasing droughts across Africa?
With the agricultural
industry being the world’s largest consumer of freshwater (~70% of global
freshwater use) and demand projected to increase by 60% over the next 5 years,
it is now more important than ever that water conservation practices and
policies are implemented across all agriculture spaces (Boretti and Rosa, 2019). This need is exacerbated by the rising threat of
extreme weather events and shifts in climatic patterns. In consequence, droughts
across Africa have become more frequent, intense and widespread over the last
50 years and are likely to worsen in the future (Masih et al., 2014). This will inevitably have a widespread impact on
agriculture with over 95% of farms in sub-Saharan Africa relying on rain-fed
agriculture. Drought conditions in 2010 and 2011 led to a decrease in
cereal production and significant livestock mortality which was ultimately a
key driver of the 2011 famine in Somalia (Hillbruner and Moloney, 2012). More recently in 2016, 29 million people across
southern Africa were made food insecure due to an El Nino induced drought
leaving many in need of vital food aid (Muzhinji and Ntuli, 2020).
To continue using
agricultural land with increasingly unreliable water supplies, technological
solutions such as GMOs might be necessary. Given the controversial nature
of GMOs, this post tries to understand if
they can be a part of the response to drought-stricken regions across Africa and
help achieve and sustain the 2nd UN SDG.
But first what are GM crops?
Put
simply, the genes of GM crops have been altered to express a certain trait. The
altering of crop genetics is not new given the practices of selective breeding which has occurred for centuries. However,
GMOs refer specifically to precise gene editing technology which transfers
genes from one organism to another. GMOs have been around for over 40 years
with the major commercialized GM crops involving herbicide resistance genes or
toxins fatal to pests. Current GM seed technologies are advancing with new
traits such as bio-fortification, resistance to fungi and viruses, salinity and
drought tolerant varieties (Godfray et al., 2010).
Are GMOs safe?
GMO
crops are now well-established globally with their increase in cultivated area
from 1.7 million hectares in 1996 to 191.7 million hectares in 2018 (Muzhinji and Ntuli, 2020). Even so, there are still ongoing debates around
the bio-safety of GMOs despite no clear scientific evidence that GMOs pose any
new risks in comparison to their commercial crop counterparts (Paarlberg, 2010). This it hasn't stopped the spread of
misinformation. For example, in 2002 a British group named Farming and
Livestock Concern warned an elected official of Zambian government that GM corn
could form a retrovirus like HIV. This couldn’t be further from the truth but startled
Zambia into banning GMOs completely. In fact, many countries producing GM crops
have benefited greatly with improved productivity and food security (Adenle, 2011).
Of
course, there are issues beyond bio-safety which need to be addressed. The few
biotech companies selling GM seeds hold monopolies over the whole GM market
making them inaccessible to smallholder farmers given their high costs of entry
and subsequent reliance on commercial fertilizers and pesticides. If seriously considered
as a solution, cost and access must be revaluated to allow resource-poor
farmers across Africa access to GMOs which could increase yields and reduce
water or insecticides usage.
GM crops in Africa
So
far South Africa is the only country across the African continent to be
commercially planting GMOs. 9 other countries (Burkina Faso, Egypt, Kenya,
Morocco, Senegal, Tanzania, Uganda Zambia, Zimbabwe) have reported field trials
of GMOs. On the other hand, several countries have now imposed bio-safety
restrictions on GMOs including Algeria, Angola, Benin, Sudan, Uganda and
Mozambique. This has meant in the past that food aid was rejected during times of food shortages because it
contained GM produce.
If
given the opportunity, GM crops could stabilize local food supply but there
remain many hurdles for this technology to reach and be adopted by local
farmers. Many activists and local farmers are concerned about high prices set
by GMO corporations where farmers are forced into a vicious cycle of taking out
loans to afford GM seeds (Azadi
et al., 2016). It is therefore fundamental that GM crops are only
introduced with the assurance they will benefit the farmers and not create new
challenges.
Drought-tolerant GM crops
Drought
tolerant GM crops are not yet widely adopted with many still being researched
and developed. However, there are innovative and exciting trials which have the
potential to revolutionize agriculture in drought-stricken regions. One such
trial is the Water Efficient Maize for Africa (WEMA) project which has shown
promising results for small holder farmers across Ethiopia using TELA – a
drought tolerant and insect resistant variety of maize (Yirga et al., 2020). Maize is a staple food for over 300 million
people across Sub-Saharan Africa so this new GM TELA maize could see widely
implementation if the interests of the farmers are put before companies’
profits. Another project ran by the Kenya Agricultural Research Institute
(KARI) have developed a drought tolerant wheat variety called Njoro-BW1, which
since 2001 has become so popular among Kenyan wheat farmers that KARI struggle
to keep up with seed demand (Academy of Science of South Africa, 2010).
GM crop debates are complex and heated. In this blog, I have only scratched the surface but I do believe that there is a hopeful future for drought-tolerant crops to help farmers protect their livelihoods during times of severe drought across Africa. If implemented fairly and access increased, there are benefits to GM crops which cannot be denied. But in my opinion, they should not be viewed as the best and only solution African agriculture has for increasing droughts. Keep your eyes peeled for the next post which discusses a very different way of addressing this issue!
Interesting post! Great structure and use of sub-headings. I would encourage you to include a sentence or two at the very start to set out the focus of the post. You do a great job of reflecting on what you have covered in the end (final paragraph).
ReplyDelete(GEOG0036 PGTA)
Really informative post Elizabeth. I also believe there is potential behind GM crops, but I am interested to here suitable alternatives...
ReplyDeleteThanks Sophia! Agreed there is lots of potential of drought resistance crops. Something I did not quite get to touch on in the post are my concerns that the fear some have of bio-safety and gene transfer to native flora will be a challenge to overcome, may hinder their implementation, and will not help encourage finance for their research and development. However, as climate change impact worsen perhaps there will be more realization that they are needed, which I presume will (like the recent work on vaccine development) promote support from governments internationally.
Delete